New UNC System policy regulation claiming ownership over all university syllabi goes into effect on January 15, 2026. While each UNC System campus may have different internal guidance on creating course plans for that university's courses, the new regulation mandates that only specific material be included in the university-owned syllabi. Rightwing activists from the James Martin Center and Carolina Partnership for Reform have already submitted public records requests for Spring 2026 syllabi. Update your syllabi to protect your classes from targeted harassment.
UNC System instructors: Only include the required information on the university-owned syllabi.
Follow the AAUP NC guidance detailed on this page. Review our draft example syllabus for complying with new regulations.
On January 8, 2026, AAUP National issued the following statement condemning UNC System Policy:
UNC System President Peter Hans’ new policy reclassifying course descriptions and syllabi as public records and mandating the creation of an online database to house all course syllabi for a given semester poses a clear and unnecessary risk to North Carolina’s students, faculty, and communities.
This policy will stifle academic freedom, chill free inquiry, and expose educators and students to politically motivated attacks and targeted harassment. At its core, this new directive is an effort to intimidate instructors whose research and teaching delves into subject matter that some politicians don’t want to see explored. Dark money–funded right-wing activists and their allies in the UNC System’s leadership are attempting to strangle critical thought and the free exchange of academic thought by harassing faculty, disrupting student learning, and threatening the pursuit of truth. Ultimately, Peter Hans’ regulation amounts to a doxxing database that will further empower those attempting to censor teaching and learning in the UNC System.
The UNC System now claims ownership over all course syllabi, even those containing copyrightable material, and those syllabi made before January 15. The hasty rollout of this policy, right as faculty and university administrators prepare for a new semester, wastes and will continue to waste significant resources and does not help students, who were already able to access detailed course descriptions prior to the new regulations.
Faculty, students, and all North Carolinians must defend shared governance and academic freedom as the UNC System leaders seek to undermine critical inquiry in service of Project 2025 and the Trump–Vance administration’s assault on higher education.
In a recent editorial, System President Peter Hans acknowledged the “outright harassment” and “culture of digital surveillance” faced by university faculty and staff. Instead of a public database, Hans and his fellow leaders should create and invest in a robust antidoxxing policy to protect all faculty and students from threats and intimidation.
Join us in opposing the UNC System’s disastrous doxxing database policy by signing this petition from the North Carolina AAUP state conference.
Protect Academic Freedom, Our Faculty, Our Communities. December 8, 2025.
Statement on US Customs and Border Protection Presence in North Carolina. November 19, 2025.
Statement on UNC Chapel Hill Administration's Violation of a Professor's Constitutional Rights. October 1, 2025.
For more, please see our page for Press Releases Issued by AAUP NC.
See our page on Resources for Protecting Our Immigrant Communities for steps you can take, for information about our rights, and for notes on trusted organizations.
See our page on Free Legal Help for AAUP NC Members to connect with our attorneys about violations of your rights or about the state of the law on academic freedom.
Our mission is to facilitate cooperation among the AAUP chapters in the State of North Carolina; to promote higher education and research in the state of North Carolina; to promote the welfare of the professoriate; to advance the causes of academic freedom, tenure, shared governance, due process, and the other objectives of the AAUP; to represent statewide the interests and concerns of faculty members of public and private institutions of higher learning; and to communicate state-wide concerns to the National AAUP.